<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CAT5e vs CAT5E vs CAT6 vs CAT6a</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.theshanks.net/2008/01/17/cat5e-vs-cat5e-vs-cat6-vs-cat6a/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.theshanks.net/2008/01/17/cat5e-vs-cat5e-vs-cat6-vs-cat6a/</link>
	<description>My views on gadgets, development and other interests</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 02:44:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Whittle</title>
		<link>http://blogs.theshanks.net/2008/01/17/cat5e-vs-cat5e-vs-cat6-vs-cat6a/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Whittle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 23:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.theshanks.net/index.php/2008/01/17/cat5e-vs-cat5e-vs-cat6-vs-cat6a/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>A few facts about CAT5e...
   We have noted that CAT5e cable lengths can exceed the 300 foot limit and still maintain the throughput specifications... when the full 100 Mbps throughput was not required (50 Mbps or so) then it is prudent to note that we have used 450 feet successfully.
   Initially the CAT3 and CAT5 classifications related to the number of twists in the wire pairs per inch yet presently I note that they use differing twists for various pairs... some reversed and some not so tight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few facts about CAT5e&#8230;<br />
   We have noted that CAT5e cable lengths can exceed the 300 foot limit and still maintain the throughput specifications&#8230; when the full 100 Mbps throughput was not required (50 Mbps or so) then it is prudent to note that we have used 450 feet successfully.<br />
   Initially the CAT3 and CAT5 classifications related to the number of twists in the wire pairs per inch yet presently I note that they use differing twists for various pairs&#8230; some reversed and some not so tight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

