<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Jim Shank&#039;s Good Info &#187; Networking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.theshanks.net/category/networking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.theshanks.net</link>
	<description>My views on gadgets, development and other interests</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 20:47:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<copyright>Copyright &#38;#xA9; TurnKey Linux 2010 </copyright>
	<managingEditor>jim@theshanks.net (Jim Shank&#039;s Good Info)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>jim@theshanks.net (Jim Shank&#039;s Good Info)</webMaster>
	
	<itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary>Just another WordPress weblog</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:category text="Society &#38; Culture" />
	<itunes:author>Jim Shank&#039;s Good Info</itunes:author>
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name>Jim Shank&#039;s Good Info</itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>jim@theshanks.net</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://70.91.172.140/wp-content/plugins/podpress/images/powered_by_podpress_large.jpg" />
		<item>
		<title>Cisco Unified Communication Manager 7 (CUCM7) on VMWare Fusion 3.0 for Mac</title>
		<link>http://blogs.theshanks.net/2010/03/07/cisco-unified-communication-manager-7-cucm7-on-vmware-fusion-3-0-for-mac/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.theshanks.net/2010/03/07/cisco-unified-communication-manager-7-cucm7-on-vmware-fusion-3-0-for-mac/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 18:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Shank</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux Stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VoIP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.theshanks.net/?p=211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Installing Cisco Unified Call Manager 7 in VMWare Fusion takes a little bit of planning but can be done with these steps.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know, catchy title isn&#8217;t it. Last week I finished Administering Cisco Unified Communication Manager 7 &amp; Unity Connection class in order to help with my overall understanding of our telecom infrastructure at the school district. It was a great class and really filled in the fundamentals I was missing. More importantly, on one of the labs, I noticed a message that CUCM was running under VM. I did some more research and Cisco actually allows this!</p>
<p>When I got home on Friday evening, freshly excited about the class, I grabbed the CUCM 7 media and fired up a new fusion VM. Settings are as follows:<span id="more-211"></span></p>
<ol>
<li>If you have the iso, click Continue without disc and then select the disc image, otherwise insert the CUCM7 installation disc</li>
<li>The system will detect RHEL4 which is correct, press continue to use the disc, then continue again at the OS selection screen</li>
<li>Uncheck Use Easy Install (don&#8217;t we all wish), click continue</li>
<li>Click Customize Settings
<ol>
<li>Sharing: Disabled</li>
<li>Applications: Menu Enabled (don&#8217;t think this matters)</li>
<li>Processors &amp; RAM: 2 CPU 2048 RAM (this does matter)</li>
<li>Display: 3D disabled (doubt it matters)</li>
<li>Printers: Enabled, match default (doesn&#8217;t matter)</li>
<li>Autoprotect: Disabled (doesn&#8217;t matter)</li>
<li>Network: NAT (more on this later)</li>
<li>Hard Disks: IDE Disk, 80GB, uncheck Pre-allocate disk space, check split into 2GB files (80GB is necessary, I think IDE is)</li>
<li>Everything else, defaults</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li>Start it up</li>
<li>Media Check: Your choice, I choose No and all was fine</li>
<li>vmware Found screen: Agree (a big thanks to Cisco for allowing this, they didn&#8217;t have to)</li>
<li>Product Deployment Selection: Cisco Unified Communications Manager &#8211; OK</li>
<li>Proceed with Install: Yes</li>
<li>Platform Installation Wizard: Proceed</li>
<li>Apply Patch: No (haven&#8217;t tried this yet)</li>
<li>Import Windows Data: No</li>
<li>Basic Install: Continue</li>
<li>Timezone Configuration: America/Denver for me</li>
<li>Auto Negotiation Configuration: Yes</li>
<li>MTU Configuration: No</li>
<li>DHCP: No</li>
<li>Static Network Configuration &#8211; This is where things get a little complicated. Start a terminal session and type ifconfig. Note the IP address for vmnet8. Mine was 192.168.223.1. This is the NAT network for Fusion. IP addresses .3-.127 are statically assignable. Thanks to <a title="VMWare Fusion NAT" href="http://blog.mclaughlinsoftware.com/2010/03/01/vmware-fusion-nat/" target="_blank">Michael McLaughlin</a> for this information. Note that if you do not setup the network correctly, the system will not install and will die with a Security configuration failed (1) error.<br />
<a href="http://blogs.theshanks.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/CUCM7FusionNetworkSettings.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-213" title="CUCM7FusionNetworkSettings" src="http://blogs.theshanks.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/CUCM7FusionNetworkSettings.png" alt="" width="447" height="335" /></a></p>
<ol>
<li>Hostname: FusionCCM7</li>
<li>IP Address: 192.168.x.3 where x is the third octet of the IP address you discovered in step 18</li>
<li>IP Mask: 255.255.255.0</li>
<li>GW Address: 192.168.x.2 where x is the third octet of the IP address you discovered in step 18</li>
<li>Press OK</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li>DNS Client Configuration: Yes
<ol>
<li>Primary DNS: 192.168.x.2 where x is the third octet of the IP address you discovered in step 18</li>
<li>Secondary DNS: blank</li>
<li>Domain: cucm.local</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li>Administration Login Configuration
<ol>
<li>Administrator ID: ccmadmin</li>
<li>Password: c123sco (a mix of letters and numbers is required)</li>
<li>Confirm Password: c123sco</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li>Certificate Information &#8211; Your locale information</li>
<li>First Node Configuration: Yes</li>
<li>Network Time Protocol Client Configuration: Yes
<ol>
<li>NTP Server 1: 64.90.182.55</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li>Database Access Security Configuration
<ol>
<li>Security Password: c123sco</li>
<li>Confirm Security Password: c123sco</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li>SMTP Host Configuration: No</li>
<li>Application User Configuration
<ol>
<li>Application User Username: ccmadmin</li>
<li>Application User Password: c123sco</li>
<li>Confirm Application User Password: c123sco</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li>Platform Configuration Complete: OK</li>
</ol>
<p>It took me about an hour for the full install and then I had my system up and running. Enjoy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.theshanks.net/2010/03/07/cisco-unified-communication-manager-7-cucm7-on-vmware-fusion-3-0-for-mac/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The IPv4 shortage isn&#039;t a hoax!</title>
		<link>http://blogs.theshanks.net/2009/04/22/the-ipv4-shortage-isnt-a-hoax/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.theshanks.net/2009/04/22/the-ipv4-shortage-isnt-a-hoax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 03:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Shank</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Watch out!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.theshanks.net/?p=129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Imagine that you are starting your new business, you call up the phone company to get a new phone number and they tell you, &#8220;Sorry, there are no more phone numbers left in the whole world, we&#8217;re out.&#8221; What would you do? What would businesses do? What would the world do? Those who already had [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagine that you are starting your new business, you call up the phone company to get a new phone number and they tell you, &#8220;Sorry, there are no more phone numbers left in the whole world, we&#8217;re out.&#8221;</p>
<p>What would you do?</p>
<p>What would businesses do?</p>
<p>What would the world do?<span id="more-129"></span></p>
<p>Those who already had all the phone numbers they need would be OK, but in the back of their mind, they would wonder what to do if they needed just 1 more. There has to be a single phone number available, right? Well, of course for enough money there would be, after-all, people would be willing to give up their phone numbers or maybe they had a few stashed that they weren&#8217;t using. Maybe they saw this phone number shortage coming and ordered a whole bunch for a rainy day or to scalp on eBay later on?</p>
<p>There is good and bad news to this example. We aren&#8217;t out of phone numbers just yet but we are dangerously low on public IP addresses. Many analysts agree that we have about 3 years left and we will be completely tapped out, world wide. You can even check out the updated statistics courtesy of <span style="font-size: x-small;">Stephan Lagerholm </span>at <a title="IPv4 Depletion" href="http://ipv4depletion.com/dashboard/">IPv4Depletion</a>.</p>
<p>I was convinced before my last two days at the Rocky Mountain IPv6 Summit that IPv6 was a tactic invented by Cisco to separate the boys and girls from the men and women when it came to certification. It was that last chapter in the book and those 10 questions on the exam that killed all but the most dedicated certification pursuers. There was no actual need for IPv6, it was just a myth that we are running out of public addresses. Nope, it&#8217;s true.</p>
<p>Luckily for all of us the Internet Engineering Task Force was aware of this problem many years ago and created a better IP protocol with a lot more addresses. Not just enough to cover the short term but enough to cover a very long time. They really aimed high on how many addresses they were going to put out this time. IPv6 provides more addresses in cyberspace than there are grains of sand on the world&#8217;s beaches. If you like numbers, it provides 340,282,366,920,938,463,463,374,607,431,768,211,456 addresses. I think we will be ok.</p>
<p>Now it&#8217;s just up to the network engineers of the world to get us there. Remember that a lot of us are behind the decision makers who need a push from you. I know it&#8217;s not something you think of much but next time you buy a networked device, ask if it&#8217;s IPv6 compliant. Give your internet service provider a call and ask them if you can have IPv6 service. Until the consumers push, this is going to be hard for us to do. If the decision makers and pocket-book-holders don&#8217;t make it a priority, we will have to throw it all together in a time-crunched-panic when they do run out&#8230; and everyone knows how well our computing efforts go when we are in a hurry.</p>
<p>If you want to dig in even more, check out the <a href="http://www.rmv6tf.org/RMv6TFDocs.htm" target="_blank">presentations and white-papers </a>I saw live at the summit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.theshanks.net/2009/04/22/the-ipv4-shortage-isnt-a-hoax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

